How should we move around in VR? Nobody has figured it out yet

...

Along with all of the exclusivity debates that have embroiled much of the talk surrounding virtual reality for the past few months, another discussion has been ongoing among gamers, developers and onlookers as well. What’s the best way to get about in virtual reality?

If you talked to Oculus VR and HTC, the two companies would likely say drastically different things. Oculus, with its focus on seated and standing experiences might try to sell you on the idea of artificial locomotion, or using gamepads and controllers to handle your in-game movement – regardless of what founder Palmer Luckey once said. HTC is likely to tell you that real-world movement is the best option for VR, letting people walk around in their roomscale-tracked spaces.

Both solutions have their drawbacks. There are immersion issues with artificial movement, and difficulties with nausea in those less experienced. Roomscale VR can dodge those problems, but it requires more space than many people have to dedicate to VR.

To find out where the future of virtual reality locomotion may go, we reached out to developers of hardware and software alike, as well as the extended VR community, to see what their take is on how we should all be getting about in VR. And we found more controversy than agreement.

Stress Level Zero was one of the first developers to come out and support the HTC Vive with Hover Junkers, a competitive first-person game. The studio wanted to take advantage of the Vive’s room-scale experience, yet also address the challenges of limited space.

That’s why the studio came up with what developer Alex Knoll describes as the “moving platform” form of virtual reality locomotion. In Hover Junkers, players choose a size of hovering ship that matches (roughly) their real-world play space, and they can walk around it using Roomscale tracking, as usual.

Moving the ship around the open maps that players fight over is handled with more artificial locomotion, as players connect their in-game tool to the drive-train of their craft and pilot it around one handed.

This blends the two common forms of traversal in virtual reality to allow for comfort and large movement throughout open areas. As anyone who has played the title goes, the idea fits snugly into the game’s world. But careful consideration was taken by StressLevelZero to make the experience of play more comfortable for gamers.

“Filling the users peripheral view with a “Frame” helps quite a bit [with that],” described Alex in our chat. He also said that making sure ships didn’t rotate was a major step in making the Hover Junkers experience a comfortable one.

Considering it was a HTC Vive launch title, that was a very important consideration for StressLevelZero. The developers knew that a lot of people who would play the game when it came out, and would be relatively new to virtual reality. It would be pointless to offer a game that was difficult to stomach right off of the bat.

Knoll’s focus on player comfort has proven prophetic. Since the release of the first retail headsets, there’s been a rise in use of so-called “comfort movement,” where rotational movement is performed in clunky jumps, rather than smoother movements more typical of first person perspectives. It’s also seen to a popularization of other types of locomotion in games, like the blink/teleport mechanic which can be seen in games like Vanishing Realms and Call of the Starseed.

Although these methods offer significant improvements to user comfort over artificial movement using a gamepad or similar input, it often leads to lazy gameplay. Enemies in Vanishing Realms can be easily defeated if you teleport close, attack, and then teleport out again. It also becomes far faster than exploring naturally in roomscale, so players often ditch “real” movement altogether.

“There are lots of interesting movement mechanics that are built into the core gameplay which are very compelling,” said Alex from StressLevelZero, highlighting Budget Cuts and BattleDome, two games that make use of the teleportation mechanic as part of gameplay and the game’s lore, which makes it feel more applicable.

But what type of movement does this movement-blending developer prefer? The most uncomfortable one: artificial movement. To Alex, teaching your brain to accept bizarre movements in virtual reality is part of learning to use the new platform – much in the same way some people had to get over nausea caused in early first person 2D games.

“I really like Windlands, as it feels the most freeing,” he said, highlighting a game that has you swinging through trees, canyons and up mountains, all utilizing artificial movement through the motion controllers.

Then again, Alex has spent almost as much time in VR as he has out of it over the past couple of years.

“I have a feeling the more people get used to VR the more it will skew towards ‘uncomfortable’ forced movement, as in traditional gaming locomotion methods. Forced positional movement with player body rotational movement seems like it could be the middle ground people lean towards.”

Of course, there’s more than one side to the discussion. We also reached out to the guys at Virtuix, the makers of the Omni treadmill, and spoke to CEO Jan Goetgeluk’s about his thoughts on moving about in VR.

He sees things differently. Virtuix opts for an all or nothing approach, suggesting that for some game genres, the only way to experience them is through a motion simulation platform like the Omni.

“There is no substitute for walking and running,” he said, when we asked about artificial locomotion, highlighting the main strength of the Omni — that you can walk and run in VR without running out of room.

What about blinking, or teleportation? When we asked the HTC Vive community on Reddit what their preferred method of locomotion in VR games was, that was the one they picked almost overwhelmingly. But Goetgeluk isn’t a fan.

“Teleportation isn’t what people thought of when they dreamed of VR,” he said. “The last thing they envision is teleporting themselves around the environment. It breaks the immersion and breaks the fun. It’s not a good solution. Developers are not happy with it either. It’s becoming a standard that everybody hates.”

The main idea Goetgeluk wants to champion is physical motion. Whether players walk around their own space or on a treadmill, physically walking around a game world is what he wants to see more of, as it’s the most immersive aspect of virtual reality.

But while some may see that as meaning games need to be smaller and designed with people’s homes in mind, he sees it as leading to only one solution.

“For VR to be comfortable and safe, you need a motion platform,” he said. “Roomscale is a lot of fun, but it’s still quite limiting, so we truly believe people will need a platform like the Omni to truly experience what VR has to offer.”

This is an interesting point to note about GoetGeluk’s stance. Although he has praised what Roomscale is capable of, and even more impressed with what the likes of The Void can do, he has a fair point in that there will always be space limitations with that sort of technology.

When we asked Alex Knoll at StressLevelZero what he thought of treadmills, he said they were cool, but not really needed right now.

“I have to focus my thoughts on what comes in the box. We have only just begun to see whats possible with just a tracked head and controllers and I imagine it will be a long time before we run out of things to do, without treadmills and harnesses.”

It’s certainly the case that tacking another $500 (or more) on top of the already rather hefty expense of a VR headset and a capable PC isn’t going to sit well with many gamers, even if they feel it’s necessary. And complex harnesses won’t be great for every game. Racing titles, for example, have no need for them.

Related: It’s possible! How to build a VR-ready gaming PC for $600

With clear paths already paved for different modes of movement, we may need to accept there isn’t going to be a one-size-fits-all solution for virtual reality. Some people really enjoy teleportation, others like artificial movement with added roomscale, and there are certainly going to be games and experiences that seem most suited to treadmills and harness systems.

Although for now it seems there is no real consensus on what the near future of locomotion in virtual reality will be, it may turn out that as people become more used to the idea of moving around a virtual world and their brain becomes accustomed to it, a blend of artificial and roomscale could be the most common.

It offers a blend of open world locomotion on a grand scale, whilst maintaining the ability to examine things more closely in-front of you. That seems to be what the most experienced gamers in our poll decided, but that was hardly an enormous sample size.

But what about VR in the decades to come? Does Alex at StressLevelZero think we’re going to end up in a Matrix-like future, or something akin to Sword Art Online?

“We are so far out from that kind of future that its similar to asking ‘wouldn’t it be cool if magic were real?'” he said. “In that sense I think the final holy grail really would be one step further; to download our consciousness into the virtual world and no longer have a need for the physical one.”

For now, he wants to see us move towards something more attainable — wireless headsets, 4K per-eye resolution, and massive increases in field of view.

Perhaps that’s what we should settle for, too. It certainly would make exploring in VR – in whatever mode proves most popular – easier, more comfortable, and more immersive.

Categories
APPLICATIONS
0 Comment

Leave a Reply

Captcha image


RELATED BY

  • 5300c769af79e

    Sci-fi sandbox game Planetoid Pioneers debuts on Steam Early Access

    The game from independent developer Data Realms is sort of like Minecraft in space, and it is counting on users to help make the game into a viral success.Instead of creating a modding community, Data Realms is fostering a contributor community.
  • 5300c769af79e

    F-Secure Internet Security (2017)

    Compare Similar ProductsCompare Kaspersky Internet Security (2017) %displayPrice% Bitdefender Internet Security 2017 %displayPrice% Trend Micro Internet Security (2017) %displayPrice% Webroot SecureAnywhere Internet Security Plus (2016) %displayPrice% McAfee Internet Security (2017) %displayPrice% Symantec Norton Security Deluxe (2017) %displayPrice% McAfee LiveSafe (2017) %displayPrice% Symantec Norton Security Premium (2017) %displayPrice% Bitdefender Total Security Multi-Device 2017 %displayPrice% Comodo Internet Security Complete 8 %displayPrice% Webroot SecureAnywhere Internet Security Complete %displayPrice% Kaspersky Total Security (2017) %displayPrice% McAfee Total Protection (2017) %displayPrice% Trend Micro Maximum Security (2017) %displayPrice% For $69.Bitdefender Internet Security 2017 and Kaspersky cost $10 more for three licenses, but both are significantly richer in features than F-Secure.
  • 5300c769af79e

    BlackBerry Quits Making Smartphones

    Once the gold standard at the dawn of the smartphone era, BlackBerry dominated the mobile market.28, BlackBerry CEO John Chen restated what he has previously, specifically that the company's future lies in software, mobile management, and security.
  • 5300c769af79e

    IT Investment Uptick Triggered By Productivity Goals

    Specifically, these firms are using IT to increase productivity while they focus on technologies such as cloud and analytics.Increased productivity ranked first of all the reasons companies have for investing in technology, and half of the respondents picked increased productivity as the biggest change technology would foment within their organizations.